Climate Scenario Analysis
Three warming pathways. Translated into your numbers.
NGFS scenarios modelled as quantified business impact — carbon price trajectories, EBITDA sensitivity, and asset-level physical risk scores. Formatted for IFRS S2 Section 10 disclosure.
NGFS pathways. Translated into your numbers.
Aretia implements the Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) climate scenarios — Net Zero 2050, Delayed Transition, and Current Policies — as quantified business impact models. Rather than abstract temperature trajectories, the platform translates each scenario into carbon price projections, technology cost curves, policy timeline assumptions, and physical hazard probability distributions relevant to your sector and geography.
Asset-level hazard scores. Not sector averages.
Physical climate risk is assessed at the coordinate level — not by country or sector proxy. For each asset location, Aretia scores acute hazards (floods, cyclones, extreme heat events) and chronic hazards (sea-level rise, increasing average temperatures, water stress) across four warming levels: current, 1.5°C, 2°C and 4°C. The output is a per-asset risk matrix covering all six hazard categories.
Scenario outputs formatted for disclosure.
IFRS S2 paragraph 10 requires scenario analysis to describe the organisation's assessment of its resilience using climate scenarios including a 1.5°C scenario. Aretia generates the full strategy section narrative — physical risk findings, transition risk EBITDA sensitivity, and business resilience assessment — formatted to the IFRS S2 disclosure structure, ready for review and sign-off.
Climate scenario analysis built for IFRS S2 Section 10.
NGFS scenarios. Asset-level physical risk. Transition risk EBITDA sensitivity. Formatted for disclosure.