Aretia Climate
Climate Intelligence

NGFS Scenarios

The climate scenarios that central banks use to stress-test the world

The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) scenarios are the most widely used reference for climate risk assessment in financial regulation · and a core input for IFRS S2 strategy resilience.

Background

What is the NGFS?

The Network for Greening the Financial System (NGFS) is a coalition of 130+ central banks and financial supervisors from 91 jurisdictions. Founded in 2017, its mandate is to help the financial sector understand and manage climate-related financial risks.

The NGFS publishes a set of climate scenarios specifically designed for financial risk analysis. Unlike pure climate science scenarios (IPCC SSPs), NGFS scenarios combine climate projections with macroeconomic models · translating temperature pathways into GDP impacts, carbon prices, energy prices and asset valuations.

Used by 130+ central banks including ECB, BoE, Fed, RBA, SARB
Updated annually · current version NGFS v4 (2023)
Combines IPCC climate science with macroeconomic modelling
Required by IFRS S2 for strategy resilience assessment
Referenced by ISSB IFRS S2, ESRS E1, BoE climate stress tests

THE THREE CATEGORIES

Orderly

Climate policies introduced immediately, transition is smooth. Low physical risk but significant transition adjustment.

Disorderly

Policies introduced late or divergently. Higher transition risk due to abrupt changes and policy uncertainty.

Hot House World

Policies are insufficient. Warming exceeds 2.5·C. Severe physical risks to assets, supply chains and communities.

Why are NGFS scenarios relevant to companies?

Regulators increasingly require companies to use the same scenarios that central banks use for supervisory stress-testing. NGFS alignment signals analytical rigour to investors, lenders and auditors.

NGFS v4 Scenarios

Six scenarios across three pathways

Each scenario represents a distinct combination of transition action and physical warming. IFRS S2 requires at least one below-2·C and one high-warming scenario.

Orderly

Net Zero 2050

1.5·C

by 2100

Climate policies are introduced immediately, and net zero CO2 is reached globally by 2050. Physical and transition risks are minimised · but only under rapid, decisive global action.

Carbon prices rise steeply from 2025 to >$250/tCO2e by 2050
Coal phased out by 2035 in advanced economies
Renewables supply 70%+ of global electricity by 2050
CCS deployed at large scale from 2030
Low physical risk · limiting warming to ~1.5·C

Risk profile: High transition cost / low physical risk

Orderly

Below 2·C

<2·C

by 2100

Divergent net-zero policies are introduced immediately but vary across regions and sectors. Net zero is not reached globally but warming is kept below 2·C with a high probability.

Moderate carbon pricing trajectory
Sectoral policies vary · energy transition is uneven
Less aggressive technology deployment than NZE
Some residual emissions offset by carbon removal
Low-to-moderate physical risk

Risk profile: Moderate transition cost / moderate physical risk

Disorderly

Delayed Transition

<2·C

by 2100

Action is delayed until 2030, then severe policies are implemented abruptly to achieve climate targets. The late, sharp pivot creates stranded assets and significant economic disruption.

Carbon prices spike sharply after 2030
High stranded-asset risk for fossil fuel investments
Economic disruption from abrupt technology transitions
Policy uncertainty discourages investment in the 2020s
Moderate physical risk · similar to Below 2·C

Risk profile: Very high transition risk / moderate physical risk

Disorderly

Divergent Net Zero

1.5·C

by 2100

Net zero is achieved by 2050 but via divergent pathways · some sectors over-decarbonise while others lag. Carbon prices and technology costs vary significantly by region.

Higher physical climate policy risk from divergence
Energy demand reduction policies more prominent
Significant regional economic disparities
Renewables scale faster but fossil fuel use persists in some sectors
Similar physical risk profile to Net Zero 2050

Risk profile: High transition cost / low physical risk

Hot House World

Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)

~2.5·C

by 2100

Only currently pledged policies are implemented. Global warming reaches ~2.5·C. Physical climate risks intensify significantly, particularly for infrastructure and agriculture.

Modest carbon pricing in some regions only
Significant chronic physical risk from temperature rise
Increased frequency of extreme weather events
Long-term economic impacts on coastal and agricultural assets
Moderate transition risk · change is gradual

Risk profile: Low transition cost / high physical risk

Hot House World

Current Policies

3·C+

by 2100

No new policies beyond currently implemented ones. Global warming reaches 3·C or more by end of century. Severe, widespread physical climate risks materialise.

Minimal carbon pricing globally
Severe physical risk · flooding, heat stress, sea-level rise
Agricultural disruption in tropical and sub-tropical regions
Infrastructure damage from extreme weather events
Worst-case scenario for physical asset risk

Risk profile: Very low transition cost / very high physical risk

Risk vs Transition Trade-off

The physical-transition risk matrix

The NGFS illustrates a fundamental insight: the more aggressively we transition, the lower the physical risk · but the higher the near-term transition cost.

ScenarioCategoryWarmingTransition RiskPhysical RiskNet Financial Risk
Net Zero 2050Orderly1.5·CHighLowModerate
Below 2·COrderly<2·CMediumLowLow
Delayed TransitionDisorderly<2·CVery HighModerateHigh
Divergent Net ZeroDisorderly1.5·CHighLowModerate
NDCsHot House World~2.5·CLowHighHigh
Current PoliciesHot House World3·C+Very LowVery HighVery High

How to use NGFS

Six ways NGFS scenarios power your disclosure

Aretia maps each NGFS scenario to your specific assets, operations and financials · turning abstract scenarios into concrete risk and opportunity assessments.

Board-level risk oversight

Translate NGFS scenarios into board-digestible risk summaries. Quantify financial exposure to each pathway across your asset portfolio.

IFRS S2 strategy resilience

IFRS S2 requires testing strategy resilience under at least two scenarios (1.5·C and high-physical). NGFS scenarios are the standard reference.

Physical asset stress-testing

Apply Current Policies or NDC scenarios to GPS-located assets. Model flood, heat and drought risk under worst-case warming trajectories.

Transition plan alignment

Align decarbonisation milestones with Net Zero 2050 or Below 2·C pathways. Identify carbon price and technology assumptions needed to stay on track.

Stranded asset identification

Use Delayed Transition and Divergent Net Zero to model abrupt carbon price shocks. Identify high-carbon assets at risk of value impairment.

Investor & regulatory reporting

Central banks in 30+ jurisdictions require NGFS-aligned scenario analysis for climate risk disclosures. Use NGFS to satisfy both IFRS S2 and supervisory requirements simultaneously.

Platform Integration

NGFS built into every analysis

Aretia's Climate Scenarios Analysis module is natively powered by NGFS v4 data. When you run a scenario analysis, you are working with the same data that the Bank of England, ECB and Reserve Bank of Australia use for their climate stress-testing exercises.

NGFS v4 (2023) · the latest release with 2050 and 2100 projections
Sector-level transition risk outputs (carbon price, revenue impact)
Asset-level physical risk scores via GPS integration
Financial impact quantification: revenue at risk, CapEx requirements
Side-by-side comparison of all 6 scenarios
Exportable scenario analysis for IFRS S2 disclosure

NGFS scenarios available in Aretia

Net Zero 2050
1.5·COrderly
Below 2·C
<2·COrderly
Delayed Transition
<2·CDisorderly
Divergent Net Zero
1.5·CDisorderly
Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)
~2.5·CHot House World
Current Policies
3·C+Hot House World

Run NGFS scenario analysis on your portfolio

Aretia applies all six NGFS scenarios to your specific assets and operations · producing financial impact estimates ready for IFRS S2 disclosure. Need expert support?